nospam0
Comment #4 Wednesday, September 7, 2005 8:22 PM
Comment #4 Wednesday, September 7, 2005 8:22 PM
This sets the standard at which all the others must meet to beat it. Good luck 
Would also make for a sweet logon screen
Would also make for a sweet logon screen
4tuner
Comment #5 Friday, September 9, 2005 7:03 AM
Comment #5 Friday, September 9, 2005 7:03 AM
Sorry, but i just use Bootskin - IconPackager and VisualStyles because I think most of the other customizing stuff (WindowBlinds 
) slow down the pc and a VisualStyle is like a normal Windows Design 
So if someone want to make a Logonscreen suitably to this Bootskin contact me on my page http://www.nachtwandler.ch and then I`ll send him a good quality Photoshop file or whatever he(she 
) need. OK 
) slow down the pc and a VisualStyle is like a normal Windows Design 
So if someone want to make a Logonscreen suitably to this Bootskin contact me on my page http://www.nachtwandler.ch and then I`ll send him a good quality Photoshop file or whatever he(she 
) need. OK 
Lazlo Woodbine
Comment #7 Saturday, February 18, 2006 11:10 PM
You need to get your facts straight: WB is almost always, if not always, *faster* than VS when using a similar skin.
It *may* be slower when using some of the more advanced features - things that visual styles will never be able to do any way.
Comment #7 Saturday, February 18, 2006 11:10 PM
| Sorry, but i just use Bootskin - IconPackager and VisualStyles because I think most of the other customizing stuff (WindowBlinds ) slow down the pc and a VisualStyle is like a normal Windows Design |
You need to get your facts straight: WB is almost always, if not always, *faster* than VS when using a similar skin.
It *may* be slower when using some of the more advanced features - things that visual styles will never be able to do any way.
Lazlo Woodbine
Comment #9 Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:45 AM
...and if you don't then pick a more simple skin without those features (something that VS could handle perhaps), WB will still be quicker than the VS.
Comment #9 Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:45 AM
| if you need this special things... |
...and if you don't then pick a more simple skin without those features (something that VS could handle perhaps), WB will still be quicker than the VS.
4tuner
Comment #10 Sunday, February 19, 2006 2:34 PM
Comment #10 Sunday, February 19, 2006 2:34 PM
say what you want... but I use VS because its like a normal XP skin (silver or blue) and WB is process in the taskman OR NOT! 
Please use what u want and I use what I need OKAY! Talk with someone other about GOOD NIGHT (good fight)
Please use what u want and I use what I need OKAY! Talk with someone other about GOOD NIGHT (good fight)
Lazlo Woodbine
Comment #11 Monday, February 20, 2006 4:11 PM
Comment #11 Monday, February 20, 2006 4:11 PM
It's clear that you believe the nonsense about VS using no resources. Just because it's hidden in taskman under a services.exe entry does not mean that it's having any less of an impact on your system than WB. Use whichever you want to use, but don't try to say that VS doesn't use memory and processor time, because it does.
4tuner
Comment #12 Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:13 AM
Comment #12 Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:13 AM
Yes it does, it replace the original images - And WB put some overlay images on the skin what means it loads the standart skin images and WB skin images.... OK I`ve a good computer with enough RAM and CPU speed 
the VS is all what i want and WB is not freeware - or?
nice day
the VS is all what i want and WB is not freeware - or?nice day
Lazlo Woodbine
Comment #13 Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:31 AM
No, that's completely and utterly wrong. WB takes over the windows drawing code, and only draws one set of images.
No, it's not, but a feature limited shareware version is available.
Comment #13 Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:31 AM
| And WB put some overlay images on the skin what means it loads the standart skin images and WB skin images |
No, that's completely and utterly wrong. WB takes over the windows drawing code, and only draws one set of images.
| and WB is not freeware - or? |
No, it's not, but a feature limited shareware version is available.
4tuner
Comment #14 Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:36 AM
Comment #14 Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:36 AM
OK... but thats new, I tried WB a long time ago (shareware) and it has some strange mistakes with titlebars in some progs 
and the loading screen. hmm... I`ll use VS anyway
and the loading screen. hmm... I`ll use VS anyway
offworld_jack
Comment #15 Tuesday, April 24, 2007 8:13 AM
Comment #15 Tuesday, April 24, 2007 8:13 AM
One of my favorite bootskins. Very clean look and nice loading bar.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading files.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Comment #1 Tuesday, September 6, 2005 5:52 AM