WinCustomize 2K9 concepts
Friday, January 16, 2009 by Frogboy | Discussion: OS Customization
The new WinCustomize is going to be a radical departure from what we have today.
In the web 2.0 age, we can do a lot of interesting things that should greatly improve the navigation of the site. The days of clicking, waiting for the page to load, clicking, waiting for the page to load and so forth will go away.
Instead, the site will feel more akin to a desktop application. Want to see the most popular skinners, click on tab and it'll expand to show it.
The site will end up being far cleaner, far faster, and far easier to use than what we have today.
Reply #3 Friday, January 16, 2009 5:05 PM
Yup, looks better and faster loading will always be welcome.
As for the tab thing...I was hoping it would look more like MyColors/Impulse.
Glad Winky's still there!
So far so good!
Reply #4 Friday, January 16, 2009 5:05 PM
I like the faster loading , but I'm a Taurus dear, I love the way it looks now, and it takes ages for me to adjust to change, but that's life.. I find it easier to navigate the way it is, dropdowns can be confusing as most of the time you don't know they are there, and you end up clicking all over the place.. ahh.. I just woke up, don't mind me
Reply #5 Friday, January 16, 2009 5:06 PM
It's sound good and as vStyle said faster would be better.
I'm not that at all up on what web 2.0 is supposed to do for the user, let alone the developer and programmer. One place I read left me feeling that with web 2.0 we lose alot of the 'eye candy'. Is that true?
Reply #6 Friday, January 16, 2009 5:29 PM
Rich Internet applications (RIAs) are web applications that have some of the characteristics of desktop applications, typically delivered by way of proprietary web browser plug-ins or independently via sandboxes or virtual machines[1]. Examples of RIA frameworks include Adobe Flash, Java/JavaFX and Microsoft Silverlight.
The term was introduced in the 1990's by vendors like Macromedia who were addressing limitations at the time in the "richness of the application interfaces, media and content, and the overall sophistication of the solutions" by introducing proprietary extensions.
As web standards (such as Ajax and HTML 5) have developed and web browsers' compliance has improved there is less need for such extensions. HTML 5 delivers a full-fledged application platform; "a level playing field where video, sound, images, animations, and full interactivity with your computer are all standardized".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Internet_application
Think YouTube or iGoogle. YOu don't click and wait . . you can actually interact with stuff.
Reply #7 Friday, January 16, 2009 6:16 PM
Thanks ZubaZ, I'm sure I wasn't the only one with those questions.
Reply #8 Friday, January 16, 2009 6:25 PM
All depends on how minimal a site goes in it's design. Naturally images that aren't made up with lots of color or depth will load faster... so the less eye candy used... the faster the site.
Reply #9 Friday, January 16, 2009 7:03 PM
I got a look at the larger site mockups (unobscured, full of goodness) before I left the office tonight. They look damn nice
Reply #10 Friday, January 16, 2009 7:04 PM
Brad, that sounds über-cool! Can't wait to see it in action!
A lill' question though... Will the site eventually be 'skinnable', as it were in the good old days?
Always good to be able to change the look, if one gets bored with the same look day after day.
Reply #11 Friday, January 16, 2009 7:22 PM
I wish this too.. while I love WC, the white kills my light sensitive peepers. Currently I am in the Christmas Card list from Motrin.
A few switchable themes would be cool.
Reply #13 Friday, January 16, 2009 8:35 PM
Reply #14 Friday, January 16, 2009 8:41 PM
I know dear, but I don't want to walk in and see a place that is totally unrecognizable is all
Reply #16 Friday, January 16, 2009 9:04 PM
Brad, that sounds über-cool! Can't wait to see it in action!
A lill' question though... Will the site eventually be 'skinnable', as it were in the good old days?
Always good to be able to change the look, if one gets bored with the same look day after day.
Hmmmm....Snowy might actually have something there....I wonder if there actually might be a way for each of us to customize the site...sort of like the way one can arrange the order of appearance, color, etc. of sites like Google News, Yahoo (My Yahoo), The old Netscape site....
Anybody but me think that might be a worthwhile idea?
Reply #17 Friday, January 16, 2009 9:24 PM
As long as it doesn't have the lightbox crap for the skin previews like on the GUIC site. You had to wait for the ENTIRE page to load (which we all know isn't very fast) before you can view the preview. If you immediately wanted to just see the preview (duh) and clicked on it before the rest finished loading, it would open a pop-up asking what application you wanted to view the image with. After cancelling that, you'd have to refresh the page, let it all load, and THEN click to see the full preview. Annoying and inefficient.
Other than that, sounds good.
Reply #18 Friday, January 16, 2009 9:33 PM
Lightbox is good as long as teh underlying page loads fast enough.
Reply #19 Friday, January 16, 2009 9:34 PM
Reply #20 Friday, January 16, 2009 9:41 PM
Anybody but me think that might be a worthwhile idea?
WC used to have the function for user's to choose a default theme to see. It disapeared a long time ago, but I wolud like to see it return if possible. I'd prefer a Darker look, like the My Colors site. Black & teal with Grey text..
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Friday, January 16, 2009 4:58 PM
I'm all for far faster.
I wonder if how the 'Top skinners' is calculated will change, some, that are listed as such, tend to release one skin after another that perhaps wouldn't be defined as a top skin by some, yet download counts would indicate that it is.
Perhaps a 'Most downloads' section would be more appropriate and Top Skinner status could be derived from the new rating system somehow.