Whilst what you say is absolutely true i have 2 issues which prevent me from running it insted of the taskbar. First the size, it takes too much space. Second i am a obsessive compulsive window closer. It's rare i have more windows open then i really actively use. I guess my generation who survived windows 3.0 is so used to the OS BSOD'ing with more then 2 windows active one just doesn't dare opening more.  

So there's no real advantage.

Wondering if there's any updates coming soon for Tiles, I really love it, haven't taken it off my deskop since day one. I rarely use my Start Menu anymore.

What I would like to see in an update would be...

- Transparency options either in the skin editor or in the right-click menu

- Option to move files around on each page cause I like to group things or have it alphabetal

heh... why do I wish I could buy this as a stand alone... and also realize that will probably never happen  

My favorite app since right click. I'm using it like a 2nd monitor taskbar until some of the wish list items are put in ....then I'll probably hide the taskbar.

Why add this to Object Desktop only? You'll lose a lot of sales that way. $50 is a lot when you don't care about skinning but want a great productivity app.

It makes sense for WB, DS and IP to be in Object Desktop, but not apps like this. Productivity apps should be seperate, like Object Dock is.

New apps are always given as betas to Object Desktop subscribers, that is a benefit of a subscription.  Once Tiles is out of beta, it will most likely be available stand-alone.

Not trying to be difficult here, but how is that image in the OP minimalist? Wouldn't it be more minimalistic to NOT have tiles, and just use the start menu? The start menu takes up less room, and you can pin stuff to it. I guess I just fail to see what this brings over the start menu.

You think the Start menu is more minimalist than Tiles?

Well...the taskbar is smaller and the start menu is hidden until you activate it...

It's better than the start menu because with Tiles you only have the apps/folders/files that you want. With the Start Menu you have to go through everything in All Programs. With Tiles, each tile (page) can be organized how you want it. And you can always put it on autohide for a minimal look.

ID, can you reply on my comment above? I keep asking, but nobody answers :sad:

Just create a menu on the taskbar and place shortcuts to apps you commonly use in that. (Or use the quick launch menu in versions prior to Win7).

Like Gwenio1 stated, this is all stuff you can do with the windows taskbar. The bar that tiles uses is WAY bigger. Both can autohide. Both can have whatever icons you want in it. I'm just curious to what tiles does that you CAN'T do with the taskbar. Like I said, I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to understand the advantage of this program.

[quote who'"Frogboy"]

You think the Start menu is more minimalist than Tiles?

[/quote]

Wiseass, heh. I meant the default taskbar. To me, that bar for tiles is WAY bigger than the taskbar. I'm just trying to see the advantage of this particular app. The only thing I see is that you can group icons together like in that shot above. But advertising it as minimalistic is a bit much.

To me, THAT is more minimalistic than the tiles one. Granted, I dont usually bother with a desktop image because I usually have a bunch of apps open, and dont see it anyways. And I haven't yet bothered to remove the IE icon, but that takes two seconds.

^most boring desktop ever award

Hahah I know. I always mean to set a desktop image, but I'm never looking at the desktop, so I forget, heh.

http://www.mediafire.com/?90car2vv9j22d4d

An example of what I meant by a menu can be seen in the upper right. It is label Launch and has button that generates a drop down.

As to the command prompt, when it is maximized and running (being filled with text) and you minimize and restore it the console moves up the screen.

I'll ask WBlinds to take a look at it, I don't have an answer for it.

I have to agree with impinc. Win7 comes with the ability to reduce things to the Taskbar. Hell, I don't even have the Computer shortcut up on the screen like him, just a series of rotating background images. As for the Start Menu, you can not only set the Taskbar to only pop up when you bring the mouse to the bottom, but you can pin things to the Start Menu's list, making it a huge list of quickly accessible apps. If done right, there is nothing but a vein at the bottom at the screen when idle.

Tiles would work wonder with Vista, no argument. Win7 I feel has pretty well taken this general idea into account.

Just curious...how is Tiles different than ObjectDock in terms of functionality?  I'm also struggling to see the difference in function between Tiles and the Windows 7 Taskbar.  The only thing I can't use the Windows 7 Taskbar for right now is I can't put a folder on them.  The only thing I can't do with ObjectDock is get the Windows 7 preview tiles (the icon-sized preview just doesn't quite do it for me).

I'd love to see the WindowsFX version of tiles come back...those were pretty cool (speaking of which...I should see if that works on Windows 7...).

As far as folders are concerned, if you drag a folder onto the taskbar, it pins it to the favorite folder locations list. If you right click on the explorer icon in the taskbar, a list will come up with frequent places, and your pinned locations.