Microsoft gets an Urge
Saturday, May 13, 2006 by Draginol | Discussion: iTunes
Andre from Windows Connected has spilled the beans on Microsoft's "Urge" (our NDA wouldn't let us talk about it).
Urge is a new music service that will come with Windows Media Player 11. It is a team up of Microsoft, MTV, VH11 and CMT. According to Andre, the goal is to provide a better experience for users to download music with more detail about the content, albums, and artist information.
Another interpretation is that it's a "better iTunes than iTunes" though the model seems to be more akin to a combination strategy where users have the choice of subscribing or buying content per piece. Other information we cannot say due to our NDA (we can only repeat what's been made public so far).
It appears iTunes is going to have some serious competition. Windows Media Player 11 not only has key features such as this, it also has a streamlined user interface that makes using it far more appealing than previous versions. The WMP team has really outdone themselves this time.
We'll have more details on Urge as they're made public.
BlueDev's PC media player smackdown - Part II
the verdict is in!
Tuesday, January 18, 2005 by BlueDev | Discussion: iTunes
Also, since audio quality will be a large factor in every player's evaluation it is worth noting that testing was made using professional Bose headphones.
Today I will probably be a little more succinct with the entries as I am attempting to cover more ground. So bear with me. These entries are what I refer to as the dark horses: players that are perhaps not as well known as the ones I mentioned previously, but they deserve a good look as well. So here they are, in a bit of a random order, but also based on how well I know the program (ones I don't know as well come first).
CoolPlayer: A free, open source little audio player that has a fair number of fans. I had checked out CoolPlayer a while back and thought it was a pretty solid audio player, but very stripped down (At the request of dabe I decided to take a look at it again). CoolPlayer has a lot of capabilities for such a small file. Freeform skinning, plenty of file types supported (especially with plugins since it is open source), it starts up nice and fast, and is simple to use. The graphic equalizer is nice as well.
Pros:
- Freeform skinning
- Small file that runs very quickly and uses little system resources
- Good audio codec support
- Open source (this always earns bonus points with me)
- No media library management
- All playlists must be created by the user (as opposed to WMP, iTunes and Winamp that can generate dynamic playlists from your library based on artist/genre/album etc.)
- Sound quality is while not terrible, is not terrific either. Lacking in clarity in the higher frequencies and depth in the lower frequencies
Pros:
- Efficient resource use by only loading the components you need as opposed to everything
- Wide range of supported codecs (if it is audio dbPowerAmp probably can play it)
- Freeform skins
- Installation locked my system from responding to volume control hotkeys. Maybe this isn't a big deal to others, but I hate having to open the volume control on my taskbar when I have nice little keys on the front of my laptop that do it for me. It also would not respond to Fn F5 or F6. This was not limited to when the program was running. I had to uninstall it to restore function
- Sound quality is muddy and weak, even with excessive equalizer tweaking
- The media library does not group well according to album, making media library management cumbersome
Pros:
- Many high quality skins available
- Good plugin support to extend the capabilities of the player
- Poor audio quality was QCD's biggest downfall. It would have stayed on my system if it didn't sound so muted an gummy.
- Media library management was lacking. You can add many files, but the playlist just isn't set up to handle a long playlist and keep it nicely organized.
Pros:
- Good skinning capacity (from the shots I have seen, haven't had a chance to use them myself)
- Good media library management
- Good sound quality, but still lacking in the clarity of the high frequencies
- High resource use. Using the default skin I am hitting nearly 40 megs of RAM while not minimized
- Sound still lacks some clarity
- They do cripple the player a bit, wanting you to purchase the pro version (this isn't the only player to do so, and isn't major, but worth mentioning)
Pros:
- Clean, efficient layout and library management makes these both easy to work with
- Open source
- Poor sound quality, even with equalizer tweaking
- Resource management issues. Musik Cube only used around 11 megs of RAM when not minimized, but was using an outrageous 60-80% CPU at all times. Bad sign
Pros:
- Sound quality is what Apollo is all about (even though I was non-plussed)
- Looks very ugly, ignoring even Window Blinds
- Very poor handling of large playlists
- No media library management
Pros:
- Very good looking player. Lots of eye candy here
- Jet Cast is fun (but I was never sure about the legality of it and so never really broadcast)
- Difficult media library management
- Poor sound quality, sounding shallow and muddy no matter how I tweaked it
Pros:
- Excellent sound quality
- Low resource use
- No skinning whatsoever (though at least this will us Window Blinds skins)
- No media library management
Pros:
- Amazing audio quality. Second to none in all the players I tested
- Very resource lite
- Can handle media library management nicely once the database is set up
- Extremely customizable
- Plain and boring to look at (at least until you tweak it, then it can look pretty nice - see examples)
- Because it is so customizable it can be a little daunting to jump right in and start using
The Final Verdict: So after all this I feel that I must elect a winner. I am afraid I cannot say without hesitation which one is the best though. I am going to have to direct myself at two different groups. First, if all you want is an all purpose audio player that works well, manages your music with minimal effort and sounds good I have to give the nod to Windows Media Player. However, if you aren't afraid to get your hands dirty a bit, play around with things, sacrifice a bit of eye candy, and have the best sounding player out there then I recommend foobar2000 without hesitation. Taking into consideration my personal preferences I would call foobar2000 the overall winner. It is simply an outstanding player, with the best sound quality and customizable to my hearts content.
If you stuck through and actually read this entire thing, just let me take this last line to say thank you.