|
Nebula FlightUpdated Apr 19, 2007 by TheMasterBaron |
||||||||||
 |
|
Page 2 of 2 | |
|
|---|
Frogboy
Comment #23 Thursday, May 3, 2007 6:23 PM
Comment #23 Thursday, May 3, 2007 6:23 PM
Depends really on your video driver.
nVidia is slow. ATI is fast.
Frogboy
Comment #24 Monday, May 7, 2007 11:55 PM
Comment #24 Monday, May 7, 2007 11:55 PM
This is really good but the resolution is what slows it down.
1600x1200 is beyond HD. It would look the same at even 1024x768 and use a fraction of the CPU.
TheMasterBaron
Comment #25 Tuesday, May 8, 2007 9:53 AM
Comment #25 Tuesday, May 8, 2007 9:53 AM
It's beyond HD on a HD TV, but not on a 20+ inch monitor. There are plenty of dreams available, but fewer hi-res dreams. After seeing a few dreams get pixelated when blown up to my desktop size, I decided to make my dreams match my desktop resolution.
I will begin creating low-res versions of my dreams in MPEG2 (1152x720 or 1024x768) so everyone will have a version they can use.
I will begin creating low-res versions of my dreams in MPEG2 (1152x720 or 1024x768) so everyone will have a version they can use.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading files.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 2 of 2 | |
|
|---|
Comment #21 Monday, April 23, 2007 9:07 PM
I don't understand why people run vista ultimate on slow PCs/laptops..
this dream runs great and i like to thx again
My Performance values are as follows:
CPU: 4.0
Memory: 4.1
Graphics: 4.4
Gaming Graphics: 4.3
Hard Disk: 4.5
How the fug do you figure that's slow? Anything less then 4.0 and I wouldn't be running Vista, but 4's across the board is not slow by any means. Just for comparison a freaking P4 3.0GHz HT proc runs a 4.2 in CPU speed on the performance values.
My guess is that the majority of the makers of these dreams have either HT or Dual Core procs and hence see 1/2 the speed costs that those of us with single core/non HT procs see because their procs split the taxation of the proc.
And I didn't say it didn't run on my laptop. It runs without a hitch, it's just that I'd rather not have my fan roast my lap because it's on full blast due to the high clock-cycles. DeskScapes does not run in the background people!!!
4.2 isnt that high.... working in the field of computers and extensively testing vista both beta and after launch.... running games on a 4.2 system isnt too pretty, this is the same concept....right now my overall system is a 5.9....that isnt even on the vista regular charts....and honestly i still chug down on some games and graphics....but for the most part i dont think it just relates to your score as much as it does to poor driver support..... i think in 3 months or so we will see dramatic improvements when looking back at these exact same dreams on the exact same systems with better drivers